QuicksearchShortcutsCalendar
Blog Administration |
Saturday, December 27. 2008Surviving the Recession: It's Back to BasicsTrackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
Frode hits the nail on the head, as usual, with respect to what our priorities should be. Many of your customers are struggling with this as well. I believe that now is the time to have a one-on-one coversation with key customers to find ways to spend your time and efforts that are beneficial to both. I agree with Frode that knowledge is the most powerful currency in these times. Make sure you have the detailed "Voice of the Customer" discussion with each customer, now. There are straightforward ways to do this, such as those described in my book, Pain Killer Marketing. Whatever method you choose, find out what your customer's pain is today, and find a way to help.
I agree with almost everything written here. However, I would add the point that I think this downturn will force many businesses to seriously re-examine their assumptions. We are entering a historic period of economic re-adjustment, where credit and debt become taboo (and severely limited), while the preference for savings increases dramatically. In this environment, any business models that relied in any significant degree on credit will be in trouble. Just look at how automobile dealers are hurting due to a tightening of credit.
Additionally, I think that anyone selling big-ticket items, or capital goods, will also find themselves in great distress as both consumers and businesses put off any big investments. Who wants to spend millions on IT system improvements when their factories might be idle next month? If there isn’t a fast return on the investment, there won’t be a sale. The types of products and services that will be particularly attractive are those that allow businesses to have a greater flexibility in managing costs. Why pay for e-mail and voice mail servers, and a fixed cost, when you aren’t certain how many employees you will have in one or two months down the road? Far better to just pay for some outsourced IT service that bills for usage, easily allowing you to reduce spending on a moment’s notice. In case you are interested, I have been blogging about economic issues at http://www.surkan.com. I also have podcasts at http://msurkan.podbean.com. Recently I have posted articles outlining the case for deflation as well as predictions for 2009. One other thought that occurs to me is that the whole nature of how business is conducted might change. Many of the hyper-efficient business management techniques, like "just-in-time", might prove to be ineffective.
I don’t know how well “just-in-time” is going to work. I suspect that in the next few years businesses will find that many things they had previously taken for granted become unpredictable. Foreign supplies might be disrupted by political unrest, trade barriers, or business closure. A supplier you relied on for years might suddenly go out of business because some counterparty they had done business with closed down overnight, taking them with them. Even GM is having to sue some of it's parts suppliers who are under chapter 11 restructuring to get goods they depend on to run their own operations. Businesses are going to have to reduce their dependencies on others, and maybe even resort to stock-piling to avoid hiccups. “Trust” will be more crucial than ever, and everyone is about to find out who they can truly rely on. Just as we are seeing the world of finance become much more simplified, with the abandonment of complex instruments (like CDOs, auction rate bonds, etc), and a return to more “primitive” and direct financial structures, we are going to see similar things happen in business. Heck, consumers are becoming reluctant to even buy gift cards anymore since retailers are going bust every day! In a way, I think we will see an emergence of ethics that the criminal world has long had. In the criminal business place (drugs, arms, etc), you have to really TRUST the people you do business with, and the consequences for failing to live up to obligations are dire. I am not suggesting that businesses will resort to violence to enforce agreements, but I do believe that close personal relationships, and cash-only type deals (i.e. show me the cash before I give you the goods) will become much more prevalent. A return to hoarding and buffering with cash tied up in inventory does not seem like a desirable strategy, especially when credit is scarce and cash more precious than ever. For small companies it is not even an option.
To make just-in-time work, however, trust and transparency are crucial. We need reliable mechanisms for signaling demand, and we need to be able to level out production over time in order to create a steady, sustainable pace. In times of uncertainty, we have to work harder to create and maintain transparency and trust. Toyota and GM are miles apart when it comes to supplier management, and this is one of the many reasons Toyota has done so much better than GM in terms of financial performance. However, the scenarios you describe are very real, and can be found in countries that do not score high on the Transparency Index (see http://www.transparency.org). An anecdote about cash-based deals: A local gas station where I live here stopped accepting credit cards a few weeks ago. They now only take debit cards and cash! Hoarding, and tying up capital in inventory, or reverting to business exclusively on a cash basis might not be "desirable" but it might well become necessary as economic disruptions make it harder to find reliable counterparties or manage risk.
Just one example I've heard about is how waves of Chinese factories are now going out of business in the blink of an eye, with the business owners just vanishing, looting whatever cash they had. Any American businesses that were counting on orders being filled are just out of luck. I've also heard about a growing number of businesses that are now in jeapardy because they took unwise bets on currency fluctuations (which had nothing to do with their core businesses). Airlines that took out long-term contracts for expensive fuel (which has now dropped massively in price) are struggling. Even farmers are now going bust as the prices for the goods they produce have plumetted. It doesn't Proctor and Gamble any good knowing they have contracts for wheat futures if those farmers who signed those contracts go out of business altogether. You can't even trust your customers anymore, now that credit has become so hard to come by. Just look at how the number of real-estate contracts are falling through these days because lenders yank funding at the last minute, even after they had earlier "approved" the loan. As the number of business failures increases dramatically, all companies will need to think about how to simplify and manage their counter-party risk. Maintaining higher levels of inventory may just be one nasty outgrowth of this. My prediction is that this will lead to the need for LESS efficiency, just to stay in business. You are suggesting, it seems like, that what we may be seeing now is an economic collapse in which reliable trade is no longer possible. Sort of an Atlas Shrugged scenario, where supply chains just fall apart as people take what they can and leave the proverbial train on the tracks.
As depressing as news report are, this does not yet seem to be happening. Our past and current clients and prospects are also not giving us the impression that there is a collapse in progress. What they are seeing, however, is a modest to sharp drop in demand, longer sales cycles, and more competition. These are symptoms of a recession and not a depression, albeit one that has developed rather rapidly and in a way that is more multi-faceted than the last few recessions. We had a housing crisis, a credit crisis, a banking crisis, a market collapse, and a sharp drop in consumer demand, all in a few weeks. What I worry about isn't so much the recession itself. I worry about what politicians now will do to "fix" it. I am not exactly predicting an economic "collapse", per-se, but certainly a dramatic economic disruption that will create masses of uncertainty throughout all businesses.
As I've already been mentioning in earlier posts there are numerous examples of businesses going bust all of a sudden leaving their partners in the lurch. Just look at all the people who did business with Lehman... Once the great credit-unwind is done business will become more predictable again, but it will be under different conditions than most businessmen have become accustomed to in the last 20 years. Private capital and debt markets will be shadows of themselves for decades. It will take a LONG time for trust to be regained in ratings agencies, analysts, investment banks, etc. I agree that there is concern about what the government will do to "fix" things, but I think policy makers (and what they do) will largely be a side show. Just look at how innefectual the Japanese central bank and government have been despite all the pumping of a huge amount of stimulus into their economy in the last 20 years. FDR's efforts were likewise impotent in halting deflation, or the depression. What the government most likely WILL accomplish is to put the nation in an even worse fiscal situation for future generations as they throw good money after bad... |